Baptism of desire

This man has a great youtube channel called "400constantine". This is one of his postings on baptism of desire.

I would also add that the errors of baptism of desire and invincible ignorance really comes down to limiting God and saying that God can not know or do all things. It is not do defend ignorant people, it is to call Almighty God ignorant! It is to say that God is not able to preach to all people, as if He was dependant on anyone else to save people. It is to say that not everyone get's a fair chance to know the Gospel. It is to say that God is not able to preserve and baptize anyone anywhere on earth. It is to say that God commands something that is not possible to do through His grace. Again, it is to call the Lord ignorant and it is blasphemy!
           I was just reading about Christopher Columbus, who came to Queen Isabella in today's Spain and claimed that God had told him to travel over the ocean. There, on the other side, he would find land and plenty of people who would become Catholics. All Isabella needed to do, was to pay for it and provide ships etc. Columbus was ridiculed by many, he was kept in waiting and rejection, first even by Isabella herself, and people called him a dreamer and a lyar. But God's will was done, and Columbus reached America in the 15th Century. And was not also 8 million indians converted to Christianity through the Lady of Guadalupe? Did not God reveal himself to Abram when he rejected his fathers idols? Or to Moses in the burning brumble? Or to Saint Paul on his way to Damascus? Or to the Ethiopian unic walking down from Jerusalem? Stop lying about God and ask Him to give you Faith in Him!

A few reasons for rejecting the SSPX

The SSPX is not a Catholic organization. The most important thing about being a Catholic, is to keep the Catholic Faith. We know that the Church is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic.. All Catholics have one Faith and those who keep that Faith are Catholics, those who do not, are not Catholics. It is not whether or not you have a Mass to go to that makes you a Catholic. For example, in Japan, after Christian missionaries had been to the country and many became Catholic, after a while, there were no Priests in Japan for SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS! This means no Mass and no confessions to a Priest. They only had baptism, because anyone can baptize, even a midwife. For example, the midwife or a family member will baptize babies when the newborn baby looks like it is going to die. But the Japanese also had the Sacrament of Marriage, because the Church teaches that if there is no priest, a couple can exchange their wedding vows in front of some witnesses, and they will be legally married, because this Sacrament is exchanged between the man and the woman, not BY the PRIEST. And they lived like this in Japan for hundreds of years. But they were still Catholics, because they kept the Catholic Faith. Why am I speaking to you about this example from Japan? To prove that other Christians have lived without the Mass before. It is not something unique, looking at Church history, that many are living without the possibility of attending a Mass.

I hope that you believe that the Novus Ordo (the Second Vatican Council "Church") are not Catholics. Why? Because they do not keep the Catholic Faith. For example, they believe that you can save your soul in any religion, like Islam or Protestantism. As long as you follow your own conscience, you will be saved. This is not the teachings of the Catholic Church. It has always taught that there IS NO SALVATION OUTSIDE the Catholic Church. If a Priest, or a Pope, teaches that you can be saved in other religions, they fall into HERESY and are no longer Catholics. There is a teaching of the Church called IPSO FACTO. It means that if you start accepting a heresy, like the false teaching that you can be saved outside the Catholic Church, or any other heresy, you automatically stop being Catholic. The normal procedure is that someone above you in the Church excommunicates heretics (they kick you out of the Church), but if the heresy is manifested (i.e. public) then you are kicked out of the Church automatically or IPSO FACTO. How? Because Gods' Divine Law kicks you out. This is what has happened to the "Pope" -and I like to call him the anti-pope. He does not believe in Catholic Teachings, and more importantly, he does not TEACH Catholic teachings publicly. And so everyone who knows Catholic teaching can see that he is not a Catholic. You do not become the Pope just because you get to wear the Papal hat.

Sedevacantists, like myself, say; okay, the Novus Ordo teaches that you can be saved in other religions (and many other heresies), therefore they are not keeping the Catholic Faith and they are not the Catholic Church/Catholic Religion. Therefore, I would have nothing more to do with them, than I would with Muslims or Protestants or Hindus. I will not listen to them about their religious believes (unless I am trying to convert them), pray together with them, celebrate Mass with them or believe that they can be saved in their religion. There is no pope at the moment, but the Church still exists as long as there are people who believe the teachings of the Catholic Church. I do not know how God will give us a new pope or when or if, but, just like the Catholics in Japan, I am just waiting and living my Catholic life. I accept that God has punished us for our sins by taking away the Pope and most of the priests for a while, and He will also fix the problem when the time is right. Maybe in my lifetime, maybe after I die. God can still save me by giving me perfect sorrow (contrition) for my sins when I confess them to him in my bedroom every night. Because God can do anything.

The SSPX has a different view. They say that having to live under the conditions that the Japanese did for such a long time is not possible, that there has to be priests available. They also think that there has to be a pope, we need the Mass, we have to have priests. It does not matter that the "pope" believes people can be saved in other religions and other heresies. Maybe he is just a bad pope.. So they actually believe that you can teach that there is salvation in other religions and still be a Catholic. And not only be a Catholic, but even Christ’s vicar on earth, the one person on earth who is supposed to protect and guide the Catholic believers, can teach whatever he wants and still be the pope… They don't believe that the "pope" can be kicked out of the Church automatically (ipso facto), even though it is a church teaching that it is possible.

And then there is another problem. If Ratzinger is the pope, then we also need to obey him. You know, do what he says and teaches. But the SSPX does not. They ordain their own bishops and priests, even though Ratzinger said NO! They celebrate their own Masses in stead of going to the New Mass or the Latin one that the Novus Ordo arranges from time to time. Some SSPX priests, maybe all, will pray "una cum" for Ratzinger during Mass. This means that they pray for and together with him as if he was the head of the Church. But at the same time they will not celebrate Mass with him or believe what he believes or teach what he teaches. Do you see a problem here? This is called SCHISM. You say that someone is Catholic but you will not be together with them in Church. And you will not obey their authority. In this way the SSPX has one leg in the Novus Ordo, and the other leg in tradition. But this is not Catholic teaching. You are not a little bit saved and a little bit not saved. A little bit Catholic and a little bit not Catholic. You are EITHER CATHOLIC or NOT CATHOLIC. And you have to choose sides, not join the Novus Ordo "just a little bit." If they are the Catholic Church, you go with them. If they are not, you stay away. There is only ONE FAITH in the Catholic Church. Anything else is no more than Protestantism, where you can pick and choose what to accept. The SSPX are therefore heretics, their priests are not obeying their "pope" (anti-pope), they are in schism with other people they believe to be Catholic, and they think that the Latin Mass is more important than keeping the Catholic Faith. Do you see the problem here?

If you ask a SSPX “priest” about his believes he will probably answer that "there is no salvation outside the Church". BUT, he will either define Church as both Catholics and those who are ignorant of the Catholic Faith, or he will say that there are also invisible members of the Church, but this is a novus ordo modern invention. In Tradition you do not have a visible and an invisible church. The Church has always been visible.

My hope is that people will have the strength and courage to look into this, so that they will not loose their souls. It is a very important topic. I also have some Church documents published on this blog, just look for the Latin titles.

The best time to be alive!

Of course all generations face challenges, and to be Catholic in a time when many, most of the time, don't even have a Mass to go to, is certainly a great punishment for our sins. A generation who has not been found worthy to celebrate the great Sacrifice, to go to Confession on a regular basis, to have the last Sacrament in time of death.. I keep reminding myself that God put me on earth during this time, at this place on earth because it is the very best time for me to live, serve and be saved from the fires of hell. Why this is the best time for me, I do not know, but it is the same for every soul. You have been given times and borders for a reason. God knows why, and that is all that is important. And so I need to remind myself that this is my God-given time. Thank you God! Help me to use it well, to be the best that I can be through Your Grace and to never give up, compromise or despair. Remember, when God called Joshua He commanded him to "be strong and of good courage, to not be afraid nor dismayed!" I decided that the following words deserved a blogpost on their own: From the publishers introduction to the book "The Catholic Controversy", by St. Francis de Sales..

Salesian tradition tells us that when St. Francis de Sales as a young priest arrived at Chablais, France in 1594, only 27 persons out of 72 000 were still Catholic (The rest were Calvinist), but after 4 years of his efforts, the figure was exactly reversed, there remaining only 27 Calvinists: 72 000 souls had returned to the True Faith. It is one of the most remarkable conversion stories in all Catholic history. People were afraid to listen to him preach, and so he dedicated himself to writing pamphlets to slide under the doors. He kept in mind a warning of Vincent of Lerins:

"Teach, however, what thou hast learnt; that whilst thou sayest things in a new way thou say not new things."

St. Francis begins his argument with an examination of mission from God, showing that the Catholic Church possesses this mission and the Protestant sects do not. He also delineates eight Rules of Faith- Holy Scripture, the Apostolic Traditions, the authority of the Church, the authority of Councils, the authority of the ancient Fathers of the Church, the authority of the Pope, miracles, and the harmony between faith and reason- showing how all point to the Catholic Faith as the divinely given religion. He states: "Ultimately, however, the sole and true Rule of right-believing is the Word of God preached by the Church of God." But why, he asks, should anyone bow to the supposed authority of a Luther or a Calvin?
         Our admiration of St. Francis´ technique must not blind us to the fact that his weapons were first of all spiritual. He had planned to take Geneva by love- "Love will shake the walls of Geneva." "Ardent prayer must break down the walls of Geneva and brotherly love charge them.." "But the way to this is the propitiation of Almighty God by our penances." A huge mural in the Visitation Monastery of Thonon in the Chablais gives us another clue to the Saint's success: It pictures him and his cousin Louis invoking the Guardian Angel of the diocese as they approached the region for the first time. And it will be recalled that in his youth St. Francis had promised Our Lady to pray the Rosary daily.
         There were also miracles. A baby, the child of a Protestant mother, had died without baptism. St. Francis had gone to speak to the mother about Catholic doctrine, and prayed that the child would be restored to life long enough to receive Baptism. His prayer was granted and the whole family became Catholic.

Hail Mary, full of Grace, the Lord is with Thee.

Blessed art Thou among women

and Blessed is the Fruit of thy womb Jesus.

Holy Mary, Mother of God,

pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.

Amen

             

Brittish press-conference after the Oslo-attacks!

Brittish muslims proclaim that "Islam is coming like a sunami-wave over Europe". They want to impose islamic laws (shari`ah) upon all European capitals, including Oslo, in a new kingdom that they call "Eurabia.."

A fast for Norway

In these days after the Utøya-killings, Norway is a nation under-going change. In a country with a population just below 5 million, not one is left unaffected in one way or another by the last week's events. People focus on the fact that lives were lost, but no one mentiones the fact that souls were lost. I hope that there are people who will humble themselves and turn to God and His Catholic Church with repentance and sincerity. This up-coming Friday, the 29th of July, we celebrate Norways Patron Saint, Saint Olav, king and martyr. I hope that Catholics around the world will have pitty on my country and offer up some prayers to our beloved Patron Saint Olav for the conversion of my people. There is also traditionally held a vigil in his honor the night before. We don't need flowers, we need that you fast and pray for us.

The evil "revelation" of Angelica Zambrano

I usually don't pay much attention to these private "revelations" that pop up from time to time. As a former protestant I did, and it was usually a waste of time. But I noticed a "testimony" that was becoming increasingly popular online, and I even found it published on a more traditional Catholic site, because this 18 year old Ecuadorian girl claimes to have seen John Paul II burning in hell because of his idolatry, while she was apparently dead for 23 hours. And so it is tempting for sedevacantists to publish her youtube-testimony to get the word going. And I must say; this girl is very convincing in many ways, and it only makes her testimony more dangerous. So I suffered through the whole thing, trying to find the agenda behind her revelation of Heaven and hell.      

 The first thing that comes to mind, is that she- and her mother, who testifies of her death, are not dressed very modestly at all (Just look at how the children of Fatima were dressed). The mother makes it clear that they are not members of a traditional Catholic Church, but of some kind of charismatic movement, although it is hard to know if it is a protestant or some kind of Novus Ordo branch.. So they are fasting and praying, and the daughter receives "supernatural" knowledge of her soon-coming death, and although she tells no one but God, this is also confirmed by a visiting "servant of God." Before this, the daughter admits that she has strayed away into a sinful life, and so she could easily have been exposed to demons, and they could still be with her if she has not confessed her sins sacramentally. Demons could have heard her talking to God, and they could also have put ideas into her mind of what signs to ask for, as well as into the mind of the visiting "servant of God."
              The vision itself sounds very conservative and convincing, but there are things that "give her away." For example, she uses a very protestant term when she claimes that Jesus, while showing hell to her, starts crying because He "loves the sinner but hates the sin." This is not Catholic doctrine at all. God would never throw someone He loves into hell, you can not separate the two things. The Bible is clear in many places that God hates the sinner as well, not just the sin. This does not contradict the fact that He loved the world so much that He gave His life for sinners. God loves a contrite heart, but not an obstinate sinner.
               A nother thing that contradicts generosity, is the fact that the girl, before dying, decides to give away all her things. But..she tells her friends that if she comes back, she want's them to give it all back to her. This does not sound like an act of charity, and it just makes her testimony less believable. Also, her mother and other laymen are annointing her with oil before she dies. It does not seem like a good thing to do, instead of having a priest give her the last sacraments. Her testimony on youtube goes on for an hour and a half, and she describes how people are suffering in hell for all kinds of sins. There are demons, worms, blasphemies, flames, sulfer, JP II, Michael Jackson and some other singer..even children condemned to hell for disobeying their parents. It all sounds very traditional and scary. And you keep wondering what the agenda really is, if this is of satan. But then, in the end, the heresies build up.
                The worst heresy is when she comes to Heaven and Mary, the Mother of God is being shown to her. "Jesus" explains to the girl how "Mary, as well as the other Saints, are completely without knowledge about what's going on down on earth. And the people who venerate them and turn to them for help are IDOLATORS.." She also mentiones the "rapture" very breefly, and claimes that babies in their mothers wombs are being rushed up to heaven, leaving the mothers with empty bellies. This is a terrible rejection of original sin and the necessity of waterbaptism for salvation. This kind of rapture is also a protestant idea, not based on Tradition. She concludes by saying that there will be a time on earth when the Holy Spirit will not be present on earth at all. This also goes against Jesus promises to the Church that His Spirit will guide the Church, and that this Church will stand against the gates of hell unto the end of time. This is not possible for the Church if there is no Holy Spirit around to help. So this revelation is very evil. It should not be used as evidence for sedevacantism and it should not be published on Traditional websites. A revelation that leads people away from the Mother of God is the last thing that the Church needs in these evil times. It just shows how evil and deceiving the devil is, and that even the elect could be deceived. Watch and pray.
           

The UN and the Vatican makes blasphemy a "human right"!

The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Resolution 1618 passed in March 2011. What this generally means, is that in the name of "freedom of speech" it has become a human right to blaspheme. The implementing of this same resolution was signed in Istanbul on the 15th of July 2011. Among those who signed the resolution were Foreign Ministers from the EU, Members of the Arab League , REPRESENTATIVES OF THE VATICAN, US Secretary Clinton and the Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

The new law focuses on the "protection" of individuals rather than religions. (Note: The obligation to defend the true faith is being replaced by the right of an individual to criticize and blaspheme the same.) Under this resolution, the international community is taking a strong stand for freedom of expression and worship, and against discrimination and violence based upon religion or belief. The document goes on to explain how "these are fundamental freedoms that belong to all people in all places, and they are certainly essential to democracy." Participants are encouraged to consider to provide updates, as part of ongoing reporting to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, on steps taken at the national level on the implementation of Resolution 16/18, building also on related measures in the other resolutions adopted by consensus on freedom of religion or belief and on the ELIMINATION OF RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE and discrimination. And now the time has come for them to move to implementation. The resolution calls upon states to protect freedom of religion, to counter offensive expression through education, INTERFAITH DIALOGUE, and public debate, and to prohibit discrimination, profiling, and hate crimes, but not to criminalize speech unless there is an incitement to imminent violence. They will be looking to all countries to hold themselves accountable and to join them in reporting to the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights on their progress in taking these steps. Quote: "In Europe, we are seeing communities coming together to address both the old scourge of anti-Semitism and the new strains of anti-Muslim bias that continue to undermine the continent’s democratic ideals. Across the Middle East and Asia, we look to both people and leaders to resist the incitement of extremists who seek to inflame sectarian tensions, and reject the persecution of religious minorities such as the Copts or Ahmadis or Baha’is." Note how there is NOTHING about anti-Catholicism mentioned. It's the one (true) faith that no one needs to address I guess.. And so the Vatican, with a true Novus Ordo spirit continues to laugh at God's commandments by making a transgression of the First and Second Commandment a HUMAN RIGHT.. To read more about it I recommend these two links: http://www.oic-oci.org/topic_detail.asp?t_id=5503 http://grendelreport.posterous.com/is-the-istanbul-declaration-really-pushback-a